Legal Opinion

Cook Farm Co. v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Waite, J. Bill by the Cook Farm Company, Limited, and others, against the city of Detroit and Thomas M. Lucking, receiver of taxes, to restrain the collection of an assessment for the laying of a water main. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

In 1897 the legislature passed an act amendatory of the Detroit water-board act, designed to provide for defraying the expense of the extension of water mains, including street intersections, by assessment upon the private property (i. e., land) abutting the streets in which the mains should be laid,' upon.a basis of the frontage of the respective lots, irrespective of value. Acting under this amendment, the water board laid a main, and the cost was assessed upon property belonging to the complainants. The act provides that:

“Whenever, in the judgment of said commissioners, it shall be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Board of Park Commissioners v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Munn v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Belding Land & Improvement Co. v. City of BeldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API