Legal Opinion

Jones v. Wide World of Cars, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 6, 1993No. 92 Civ. 4668 (VLB)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.

I

This diversity action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2) arises from the retention of a $50,000 deposit furnished by plaintiff Michael Jones (“Jones”) to defendant Wide World of Cars, Inc. (“Wide World”). Jones wired this sum to Wide World on August 21, 1990 in anticipation of purchasing a Ferrari F40 automobile (“F40”). Further negotiations failed to produce a written contract; Wide World refuses to return Jones’ deposit.

Jones moves for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 with respect to the following claims:

1) Wide World’s…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Thomson v. GaskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Jurldine A. Donaldson v. Paul v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. O'BRIEN v. AlexanderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. Steinmetz v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
  3. Shred-It USA, Inc. v. Mobile Data Shred, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  4. Schueler v. Roman Asphalt Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  5. Integrity Material v. Deluxe Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API