Legal Opinion
Padco, Inc. v. Kinney & Lange
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 5, 1989No. C6-89-192PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
A. PAUL LOMMEN, Judge.
Padco, Inc. appeals from a grant of summary judgment to Kinney and Lange and David Fairbairn. We affirm.
FACTS
In February 1981 EZ Paintr Corporation (EZ Paintr) initiated an action in federal court against Padco, Inc. (Padco) for patent infringement. Kinney and Lange law firm represented Padco in the action, with David Fairbairn as the lead attorney. During the next two years Kinney and Lange rendered over 900 hours of legal services to Padco on the case.
In April 1983 two attorneys who worked for the firm of Schroeder and Siegfried, Charles Steffey and Wayne…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Baker v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Rice v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Blue Water Corp., Inc. v. O'TOOLESupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Gilchrist v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- TCI Business Capital, Inc. v. Five Star American Die Casting, LLC, Brian T. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- City of Farmington Hills Employees Retirement System v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Hot Stuff Foods, LLC v. DornbachDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Reisdorf v. 13, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Johnson v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.