Legal Opinion

Dryden v. Calk

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided June 17, 1991No. Civ. A. L-89-10PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KAZEN, District Judge.

Pending is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff, Edward J. Dryden, is suing the Defendants, members of the Wright family, for their alleged breach of a covenant to provide road, water and sewage connections to land under a letter agreement made with Dryden Real Estate, Inc. (DRE). Plaintiff Dryden claims as DRE’s successor-in-interest, being the sole remaining shareholder of DRE, a now-defunct corporation. The Defendants argue that the Plaintiff has no standing to bring this lawsuit and, in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Westland Oil Development Corp. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Republic National Bank of Dallas v. Northwest National Bank of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. INWOOD NORTH HOMEOWNERS'ASS'N v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Logan v. ThomasonTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. CullersTexas Supreme Court · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Waterman Steamship Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992
  2. Vedros v. PUBLIC GRAIN ELEVATOR OF NO, INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Vedros v. Public Grain Elevator of New Orleans, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API