State v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, J.:
Furman Thompson appeals his convictions for first degree burglary and attempted armed robbery, claiming the judge erred in failing to direct a verdict of not guilty. We affirm.
FACTS
On the morning of February 16, 2004, Thompson met with Wanda Harris and discussed whether she knew of a “lick.” Harris testified a “lick” is a target for a robbery. Later that • day, Harris called Thompson and told him about a potential lick and asked him to meet her. Thompson showed up approximately one hour later with Darrel Sturkey, the codefendant in the underlying case. Sturkey and Harris planned…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. McHoneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- State v. CondreyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- State v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- State v. BlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
- State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
- State v. HarrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- State v. MattisonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008