Legal Opinion
Lindeman v. Kelso School District No. 458
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 19, 2005No. 31825-3-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Richard and Ginger Lindeman appeal a trial court’s denial of their motion to show cause and its dismissal of their public disclosure act (PDA) claim to require the Kelso School District (District) to produce a redacted version of a school bus surveillance videotape under RCW 42.17.310(2). The tape showed a fight on the school bus involving another student hitting the Lindemans’ son. The School District allowed the Lindemans to view the tape, but *529it refused to turn over a copy for them to keep, asserting that the District had retained this tape solely for disciplinary purposes; otherwise,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. DelgadoWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. J.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- DeLong v. ParmeleeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- DeLong v. ParmeleeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Lindeman v. Kelso School Dist. No. 458Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Lindeman v. Kelso School District No. 458Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Lindeman v. Kelso School Dist. No. 458Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.