Legal Opinion
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Blade
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 16, 1953No. 14079PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, District Judge.
The defendants in the above entitled action are Frank R. Blade, an individual, alleged to have been an. employee of the plaintiff from the years 1937 until December 1951 as Advertising Manager of' the Los Angeles group of stores owned and operated ¡by the plaintiff; Metropolitan Engravers, Ltd., and Metropolitan Mat Service, Inc., two California Corporations, the latter one of which is alleged to be “wholly owned and controlled by the individuals Gregory F. Duffy, Aubrey A. Duffy> Alfred Smutz and Walter C. Duffy, who likewise are alleged to be the officers, agents and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lorain Journal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Appalachian Coals, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Willard Dairy Corporation v. National Dairy Products Corporation and Sealtest, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- Northern California Monument Dealers Ass'n v. Interment Ass'nDistrict Court, D. California · 1954
- Bolick-Gillman Company v. Continental Baking CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1961
- Owens Generator Co. v. H. J. Heinz Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1958
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. BladeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.