Legal Opinion

De Nicola v. United Electric Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 20, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCapotosto, J.

This case is before us on the plaintiff’s exception to a decision sustaining the defendant’s demurrer to his amended declaration.

The action is trespass on the case for negligence. The plaintiff was a passenger on a street railway car of the defendant which collided with an automobile at or near the intersection of Fountain and Mathewson streets in the city of Providence on May 29, 1934. The declaration sets forth the defendant’s alleged breach of duty by charging that it “then and there did so negligently, carelessly^ and recklessly guide, operate and control its said street railway car in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Simone v. the Rhode Island CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1907
  2. O'Donnell v. United Electric Railways Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1926
  3. Fagan v. Rhode Island CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1905
  4. Chappell v. United Electric Railways Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1930
  5. Ferra v. United Electric Railways Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Capital Transit Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  2. Kormahyah Karmue v. P Brenton Moore, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
  3. Karmue v. RemingtonDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API