Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 11, 1985No. C4-85-473PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

This case is brought before this court by writ of certiorari. Relator, Theresa Jackson, originally filed a claim petition with the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, Workers’ Compensation Division, against respondent, Red Owl Stores, Inc., and its insurers for expenses incurred in treatment of a systemic rheumatoid shoulder disorder and for psychological consultations. A compensation judge found that 1983 amendments to the Workers’ Compensation Act made all determinations necessary in monitoring medical expenses the exclusive responsibility of the commissioner of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blue Earth County Welfare Department v. CabelleroSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Rohr v. Knutson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Eide v. Whirlpool Seeger Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Wallace v. Judd Brown Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reider v. Anoka-Hennepin School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Kurowski v. Kittson Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Washington County School District v. Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Violette v. Midwest Printing Co.-Webb PublishingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Gutz v. Honeywell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API