Legal Opinion

Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. of California v. Metzger

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1940No. 7546PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge Taylor

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

The manner in which this case arose, together with a portion of its background, is stated in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals (124, S. W. (2d) 417), which see. That statement will not be repeated here and will not be added to except as may be deemed helpful in discussing the questions involved.

The pleadings of Susan Metzger, defendant in error here, and the issues submitted to the jury, disclose that the suit is predicated, in final analysis, upon an alleged promise, or inducement, by Pacific Mutual Life…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co. v. Dallas Steam Laundry & Dye WorksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Metzger v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. MetzgerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Murren v. Foster, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API