Legal Opinion

State v. Ryland

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1992No. S-91-554PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The deputy sheriff who arrested Robert W. Ryland had no probable cause to stop Ryland while he was driving his motor vehicle, and therefore, Ryland’s Garden County Court jury conviction of driving while under the influence of alcoholic liquor, or while driving with a concentration of ten-hundredths of 1 gram or more by weight of alcohol per 210 liters of his or her breath, must be reversed.

In reviewing a criminal conviction, an appellate court does not resolve conflicts of evidence, pass on credibility of witnesses, evaluate explanations, or reweigh evidence. Such matters are for the finder…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. TwohigNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. PrahinNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. RichterNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. ColgroveNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Kodiak v. SamaniegoAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. LaPlanteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  3. People v. HernandezNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. DoreyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. State v. DoreyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API