Legal Opinion

State v. Colgrove

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1977No. 40788PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClinton, J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether certain physical evidence, seized in a search of the defendant’s person and automobile and received in evidence at trial over the defendant’s objection, should have been suppressed because the search and seizure were without the probable cause required by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Article I, section 7, of the Nebraska Constitution. See, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643, 81 S. Ct. 1684, 6 L. Ed. 2d 1081, 84 A. L. R. 2d 933; Ker v. California, 374 U. S. 23, 83 S. Ct. 1623, 10 L. Ed. 2d 726. Previous to trial defendant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. ElenekiHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. KretchmarNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. RylandNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. ReeseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  5. State v. ColgroveNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API