Legal Opinion

Telephone & Data Systems, Inc. v. Amcell F Atlantic City, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 22, 1994No. 94-7021PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Upon consideration of the court’s order to show cause, filed February 3, 1994; appellants’ response thereto; appellees’ reply to the response; appellants’ motion for leave to file a reply thereto, and the lodged reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a reply to appellees’ reply be granted. The Clerk is directed to file the lodged document. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the order to show cause be discharged. Appellants’ notice of appeal was due, pursuant to Fed. R.App.P. 4(a)(1), on January 19, 1994, 30 days after December 20, 1993, the date of entry of the district court’s…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union National Bank v. LambSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Gridiron Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Prudential Oil & Minerals Company, a Utah Corporation v. Robert G. Hamlin, Robert Crail and H. M. Scheurn v. Roy Jones, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  4. Hector Emilio Reyes-Cardona v. J. C. Penney Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Telephone And Data Systems, Inc. v. Amcell F Atlantic City, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  2. Cupp v. PlastirasDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API