Telephone & Data Systems, Inc. v. Amcell F Atlantic City, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Upon consideration of the court’s order to show cause, filed February 3, 1994; appellants’ response thereto; appellees’ reply to the response; appellants’ motion for leave to file a reply thereto, and the lodged reply, it is
ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a reply to appellees’ reply be granted. The Clerk is directed to file the lodged document. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the order to show cause be discharged. Appellants’ notice of appeal was due, pursuant to Fed. R.App.P. 4(a)(1), on January 19, 1994, 30 days after December 20, 1993, the date of entry of the district court’s…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Union National Bank v. LambSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Gridiron Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Prudential Oil & Minerals Company, a Utah Corporation v. Robert G. Hamlin, Robert Crail and H. M. Scheurn v. Roy Jones, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Hector Emilio Reyes-Cardona v. J. C. Penney Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
4Cited by2 opinions
- Telephone And Data Systems, Inc. v. Amcell F Atlantic City, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Cupp v. PlastirasDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024