Legal Opinion
Cupp v. Plastiras
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 15, 2024No. 3:24-cv-03241Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RONALD CUPP, Case No. 3:24-cv-03241-JSC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 30 10 BASIL PLASTIRAS, et al., Defendants. 11 12 13 Plaintiff Ronald Cupp sues Defendants Basil Plastiras, Michael Terrizzi, Plastiras & 14 Terrizzi, APC, Parkway Properties 12 LLC. Plaintiff pleads claims under federal and state laws, 15 including bankruptcy protections, consumer protection laws, slander of title, quiet title, 16 cancellation of instruments, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and defamation.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Sanford v. MemberWorks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Ruvacalba v. Munoz (In Re Munoz)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Lezlie Gunn v. Christine DrageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.