Legal Opinion

Paul v. N. L. Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 9, 1980No. 52413PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Justice:

The quandary of the absent, or “ghost”, tortfeasor is brought before this Court for the first time since we decided that several liability shall rule in comparative negligence cases. 1

Plaintiff Paul was working at an oil drilling site in Canadian County. Defendant Stelting was delivering a load of drilling mud for Defendant N. L. Industries, Inc. The only road to the mud storage house passed between a butane storage tank and the drilling rig, and over a pipeline connecting the tank with the rig. While maneuvering his truck over this road, a leak developed in the butane line,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Brown v. KeillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Laubach v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  4. Walton v. TullSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  5. Ross v. KobersteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Fabre v. MarinSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Myers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. GOWENS v. BARSTOWSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  5. Baldwin v. City of WaterlooSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API