Rocky Mountain Gold Mines, Inc. v. Gold, Silver & Tungsten, Inc.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Dissent
Mr. Justice Francis E. Bouck
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the court.
1. The Contract.
The case at bar involves a document containing a lease and an option, each of which is as complete in itself as if it were a separate instrument. Except as to formal parts. and the description of the mining property demised, the entire document is quoted in the opinion of the court. I ask the reader to refer to it in connection with this dissent.
As one reads the lease it is not unlike the typical Colorado mining lease with the usual provisions 'as to the amount and character of work and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Phillis v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Fairview Mining Corp. v. American Mines & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Hoagland v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
- Jones v. BoyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
- Soule v. KunkleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.