Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1913No. Docket No. 137PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Chippewa; Shepherd J., presiding. Case by Frank Murphy against the Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

In the spring of 1910 the defendant company was engaged in a large excavation job at Sault Ste. Marie in this State, known as the canal-widening *218job. The excavating work was done by steam shovels, and the dirt was removed by means of small cars operated by engines on tracks built for that purpose. When the work of this construction was first started, ,a single track was used; but during the fall and winter prior to the accident which resulted in the present litigation another track was installed, known as track No. 2.

The plaintiff was engaged as a brakeman, and on the night on which it is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bradburn v. Wabash RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Kaukola v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Milbourne v. Arnold Electric Power Station Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lahti v. Tamarack Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Lahti v. Tamarack Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API