Legal Opinion
In Re UMWA Employee Ben. Plans Litigation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 3, 1992No. Multidistrict Litigation No. 886, Civ. A. Nos. 88-969, 88-3716, 89-2833 and 91-3241, Misc. No. 91-386PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
782 F.Supp. 658 (1992)
In re UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS LITIGATION.
UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA 1974 PENSION TRUST, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
The PITTSTON COMPANY, et al., Defendants.
UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA 1950 BENEFIT PLAN AND TRUST, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
PITTSBURG & MIDWAY COAL MINING CO., Defendant.
John Allen PIERCE, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA 1950 BENEFIT PLAN AND TRUST, et al., Defendants.
UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA 1974 PENSION TRUST, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
RAWL SALES & PROCESSING CO., Defendant.
Multidistrict Litigation No. 886,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- 348 37th Street LLC v. Lloyd's London-Brit Global Specialty USADistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022