Legal Opinion
ASTORIA ENTERTAINMENT, INC. v. DeBartolo
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided May 22, 2009No. 2008-C-1690PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
liWe granted this writ application to determine whether the court of appeal correctly affirmed the trial court’s grant of the defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment, finding that the defendants were immune from any liability by applica tion of the Noerr-Pennington doctrine. Because we find that Noerr-Pennington does not apply to grant civil immunity for the defendants’ illegal actions, we reverse the decision of the court of appeal.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On December 1, 1998, Plaintiff, Astoria Entertainment, Inc. (“Astoria”), filed suit against defendants Edward…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Coll v. First American Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- ACI Worldwide Corp. v. Baldwin Hackett & MeeksNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Salem Grain Co. v. Consolidated Grain & Barge Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Capitol House Preservation Co. v. Perryman Consultants, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- State v. PrinceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.