Legal Opinion

Lundblad v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 1, 1943No. 45320PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Whitaker, Judge,,

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, a Warrant Officer, Army Mine Planter Service, United States Army, sues for the rental allowance to which he is-entitled under the Act of May 31, 1924 (43 Stat. 250), for the period from January 26, 1935 to March 2, 1937, inclusive. During this period the plaintiff was on duty on the mine planter Col. Geo. F. E. Harrison stationed at Fort Mills, Philippine Islands. Throughout this 'period he was on continuous sea duty, except for five occasions when the mine planter had to undergo major repairs, during which time he occupied a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wiser v. LawlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Crary v. DyeSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Fraser v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. J. H. Gerlach Co. v. NoyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Lake v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hadden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  2. McVane v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API