Stewart v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
YEAGLEY, Associate Judge:
Appellant Stewart was convicted of escape in violation of D.C.Code 1973, § 22-2601 after a trial on stipulated facts. Although the defendant acknowledged that he had failed to return to custody after being issued a temporary pass, he made a proffer of proof that his failure to return was not willful, but involuntary and induced by duress. The trial court found as a matter of law that the proffer, even if proved, would not constitute a valid defense to a charge of escape. Appellant contends that the court erroneously rejected his duress defense. We affirm.
The parties…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. LovercampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- James Castle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- People v. DuvernayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. HarmonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- United States v. Don Garriga ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gooding v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- United States v. Clifford Bailey, United States of America v. Ronald Clifton Cooley, United States of America v. Ralph WalkerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- McNeely v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. StrockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- State v. PichonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.