Legal Opinion

Stewart v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1977No. 10681PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YEAGLEY, Associate Judge:

Appellant Stewart was convicted of escape in violation of D.C.Code 1973, § 22-2601 after a trial on stipulated facts. Although the defendant acknowledged that he had failed to return to custody after being issued a temporary pass, he made a proffer of proof that his failure to return was not willful, but involuntary and induced by duress. The trial court found as a matter of law that the proffer, even if proved, would not constitute a valid defense to a charge of escape. Appellant contends that the court erroneously rejected his duress defense. We affirm.

The parties…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. LovercampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. James Castle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  3. People v. DuvernayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. People v. HarmonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. United States v. Don Garriga ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gooding v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. Clifford Bailey, United States of America v. Ronald Clifton Cooley, United States of America v. Ralph WalkerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  3. McNeely v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. People v. StrockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  5. State v. PichonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API