Legal Opinion

People v. Canada

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 9, 1960No. Crim. 7068PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVallee, J.

A jury convicted defendant of attempted robbery. Motion for a new trial was denied. Defendant appeals from the judgment and order denying a new trial. It is conceded the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict. The sole specification of error is that the court abused its discretion in denying a new trial.

Oscar Hatcher, a foreman at Douglas Aircraft, testified that about 4 p.m. on Friday, May 22, 1959, he parked his car in the parking lot of Bank of America at Holmes and Florence Avenues. He rolled up the windows, locked the car, and went into the bank to cash a check. He cashed the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lohman v. LohmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Bailey v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. BeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. GreenwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Estate of HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. People v. CuevasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. GainesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API