Legal Opinion

McClintic v. Midland Grocery & Dry Goods Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1913No. 2297PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals, Second District, in an appeal from Midland County. The Midland Grocery & Dry Goods Company sued McClintic for foreclosure of a judgment lien on land. It had judgment, which was affirmed on appeal by defendant, and he obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hawkins

Continuously since prior to May 28, 1906, Mrs. M." E. Skeen and J. C. Skeen have been and are 'husband and wife, and during all of that time he has been and is an invalid, and unable to contribute to the support of himself' and his family, and they have been supported by her. G-. T. McClintic is a brother-in-law of J. C. Skeen, and is the father of C. A. McClintic.

Section 10 in block 42, township 5 S., certificate No. 4193, issued to the Texas & Pacific Railway Company, was State school land, lying in Upfon County, and was sold by the State on March 23, 1906, to Hardin, who settled lipón and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Welder v. LambertTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Creamer v. BriscoeTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Sparks v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Higgins v. Emily Johnson's HeirsTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Schuster v. L. Bauman Jewelry Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Colden v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Larrabee v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Stiles v. HawkinsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1918
  4. McFaddin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943
  5. Foster v. ChristensenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API