Legal Opinion

Meske v. Wenzel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1945PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The action is replevin brought in the civil court of Milwaukee county. Judgment was entered therein for possession of the property or for its value if delivery could not be had and for six cents damages for its detention. The defendant appealed to the circuit court and the civil court judgment was affirmed, and like judgment was entered in the circuit court. From that judgment the defendant appeals to this court.

The property replevied was covered by a chattel mortgage executed by the defendant running to the plaintiffs Meske and Lundquist as named mortgagees. Plaintiff Lundquist was a partner…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. President of Kilbourn City v. Southern Wisconsin Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Morse v. RyanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Schuhknecht v. RobersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Sauerhering v. RuepingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Cohn v. HeimbauchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Tri-State Home Improvement Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Delany v. DelanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Kroeplin Farms General Partnership v. Heartland Crop Insurance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. HarperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Andersen v. KojoCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API