Legal Opinion
United States v. DiGrazia
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 25, 1963No. 62 CR 16PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILL, District Judge.
Defendants Rose and Medo Calzavara have moved to quash the indictment in the present cause as it relates to them. The motion is based on the alleged violation of certain asserted constitutional rights in connection with their separate appearances before a Federal Grand Jury in May, 1961.
At an oral hearing in this Court pursuant to the motion, testimony was taken of both Rose and Medo Calzavara and of the F.B.I. agents and Assistant U. S. Attorney Matthew M. Corry who participated in the investigation of the case and the presentment before the Grand Jury in Milwaukee,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- United States v. Patrick J. ScullyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- United States v. Harold ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- United States v. WellsDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1908
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Alfred Joseph SamangoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- David R. Jones v. United States of America, Willie L. Short, Jr. v. United States of America, Arthur L. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- United States v. GoldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- United States v. Robert ChevoorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Robert Hawthorne, Inc. v. Director of Internal RevenueDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.