Legal Opinion
Clary v. Stack Steel and Supply Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 1980No. 4194PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOR, Justice.
The main question presented in this appeal is whether the superior court erred in dismissing a complaint for failure to state a cause of action.
In April of 1978, Donald G. Clary filed a complaint in superior court against appel-lees. The complaint alleged that in late 1969 Clary and his wife Carmela settled certain tax disputes with the federal and state governments by entering into agreements obligating the Clarys to pay a sum “in excess of $25,000” within thirty days; 1 that the Clarys owned 286 of the 300 outstanding shares of Arctic Steel Fabricators and Supply,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nizinski v. CurringtonAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Nitrini v. FeinbaumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Louis Dreyfus Corporation, Formerly Doing Business as Leval & Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Landon v. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Estate of Waters v. HoadleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Westinghouse Credit Corp. v. GRANDOFF INVEST., INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Baratta v. KozlowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Jones v. JonesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- City Of Saint Paul, Alaska v. Donald EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Standard Alaska Production Co. v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Bangerter v. PettyUtah Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.