Legal Opinion

Houghton Mifflin Co. v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 31, 1938No. Gen. No. 39,748PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett

This case involves a construction of section 9, subd. 3, of the Negotiable Instruments Law. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1937, ch. 98, §29, p. 2130; Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 89.029.)

The material facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff corporation for many years has been engaged in the business of publishing books in Chicago and in connection with its business has carried a checking account with the defendant bank. Plaintiff’s bills have been paid by checks drawn on this account, and the salesmen employed by it from time to time have been paid by checks drawn thereon. This suit is based upon the payment by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States Cold Storage Co. v. Central Manufacturing District BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Moran v. BowleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  4. First National Bank v. Hahnemann Institutions of Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
  5. United States v. BashawCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Meng v. Maywood Proviso State BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  2. People v. DauphinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  3. People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Prugh, Combest & Land v. Linwood State BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Jeanette Frocks, Inc. v. First Produce State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API