Legal Opinion

Iannarelli v. Young

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 2017No. 28151PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Retired Justice

[¶1.] Habeas petitioner asserts denial of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and Sixth Amendment right to counsel. We affirm.

Background

[¶2.] On February 16, 2007, Michael Ian-narelli murdered his disabled wife and raped his fourteen-year-old stepdaughter. Afterwards, he made a pot of coffee and called 911. Iannarelli told law enforcement that he had killed his wife. The State charged Iannarelli with first-degree murder and second-degree rape. The State indicated that it intended to seek the death penalty.

[¶3.] The circuit court appointed Attorney Roger…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Penry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Buchanan v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Estrada v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Loop v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lacroix v. FlukeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Wright v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Wright v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API