Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Cross

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1923No. 23080PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

On October 14,1920, Dr. Cimillos Cross instituted a suit in the circuit court of Clay county against the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York seeking to recover on a permanent disability policy for certain periods of disabil*639ity then claimed by him. Service of summons was had on T. M. Henry, state insurance commissioner, and, the casualty company having failed to enter its appearance, in due-course, at the January, 1921 term of the coúrt, a default judgment was entered against the company. After the adjournment of the term of court, notice of the default judgment was given to the insurance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Planters' Insurance v. MyersMississippi Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Aetna Ins. v. RobertsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  3. American Life Insurance v. MahoneMississippi Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Fraternal Aid Union v. WhiteheadMississippi Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. CrossMississippi Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Home Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. ThornhillMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Travelers Insurance v. ByersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. World Insurance Company v. BetheaMississippi Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Alcoc KCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  5. Franklin Life Ins. v. CritzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API