Legal Opinion
Kansallis-Osake-Pankki v. Kouri
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 18, 1994No. 93 Civ. 0776 (RWS)Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Kansallis-Osake-Pankki (“KOP”) has moved to stay this action against Defendant Pentti J. K. Kouri (“Kouri”) and to compel arbitration in Finland of certain issues arising out of a July 25, 1991 settlement agreement between the two parties (the “Settlement Agreement”). For the reasons set forth below, KOP’s motion to stay is granted in part and denied in part.
The Parties, Prior Proceedings, and Facts
The relationship between the parties and the history of this dispute are recounted in the prior opinions of this Court issued on July 22,1993, see…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,406 R. Stockton Rush, III v. Oppenheimer & Co., and Scott SeskisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Carcich v. Rederi A/B NordieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Julie Cotton, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. William Slone, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Kansallis-Osake-Pankki v. KouriDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993