Kansallis-Osake-Pankki v. Kouri
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Kansallis-Osake-Pankki (“KOP”) has moved for default judgment against Defendant Pentti J.K. Kouri (“Kouri”) and alternatively for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. For the reasons set forth below, both motions are denied at this time.
The Parties
KOP is a prominent Finnish bank authorized to do business in New York and maintaining an office here. Kouri is a Finnish citizen domiciled in Greenwich, Connecticut. He is a majority shareholder of KC Holding Oy (“KC-OY”), a Finnish company formerly known as Kouri Capital Oy.
Prior Proceedings
This…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fred Traguth and Otto Handtke, Individually and Doing Business as Dance Motion Press v. D'LeLa ZuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- John F. Meehan and Robert W. Fink A/K/A Meehan & Fink v. John Snow and Judy SnowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Donald Binder v. Long Island Lighting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Walcutt v. Clevite Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Agapov v. UBIF Franchising Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Kansallis-Osake-Pankki v. KouriDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994