Legal Opinion

GRIEVANCE ADM'R, ATTY. GRIEVANCE COM'N v. Fieger

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 21, 2005No. 05-72264PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR REMAND

BATTANI, District Judge.

Before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion for Remand (Doc. # 3). The Court heard oral argument on September 14, 2005. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court took the matter under advisement. Respondent subsequently filed an Addendum to his Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Petitioner’s Motion to Remand and an Affidavit. The Court has reviewed the additional filings. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Petitioner’s motion and REMANDS this matter to the Michigan Supreme Court.

I.FACTS

On April 17,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Beneficial National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grievance Administrator v. FiegerMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Fieger v. Michigan Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Fieger v. Michigan Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. Geoffrey Fieger v. Michigan Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Grievance Administrator v. FiegerMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API