Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Meigio

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1941No. Appeal, 50PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baldrige, J.,

Opinion by

The appellant was indicted, charged in two separate bills of indictment with (1) committing malicious mischief, and (2) conspiracy to commit malicious mischief. The jury rendered a verdict of not guilty on the first indictment and guilty on the second.

The court below overruled defendant’s motion for a new trial and imposed a sentence to undergo an im prisonment of six months and pay a fine of $300. This appeal followed.

The first position taken by appellant is that his rights were prejudiced by the conduct of a court crier when the jury was deliberating in the jury room.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  2. Commonwealth v. KluskaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Commonwealth v. HouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Welshire v. BruawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Commonwealth v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SchifskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Commonwealth v. KohlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. State v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API