Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 1, 1928No. Appeals, 50 and 51PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,

The two defendants in these cases were convicted upon indictments which charged, in several counts, that they administered drugs to the wife of one of them, to procure a miscarriage, and used instruments with like intent, resulting in her death. They were tried together and sentenced at the same time to like punishments; both appealed to' the Superior Court, which tribunal reversed the judgments of the court below and awarded a new trial. The Commonwealth appealed to this court from that order. The only point for decision is common to both appeals, so…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MeyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Commonwealth v. MarshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Commonwealth v. DilsworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Commonwealth v. DailySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. State v. AuldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  3. Commonwealth v. BallemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. State v. SchifskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Robert G. Cox v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API