Jerald E. Bloom v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal requires that we apply the zone of danger test recently announced in Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Gottshall, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 2396, 129 L.Ed.2d 427 (1994), to a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress. The claim was brought by plaintiff Jerald E. Bloom, a railroad employee, against his employer Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq. (1986), and resulted in a large judgment in his favor against Conrail. Bloom’s injuries were caused by the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Niederman v. BrodskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Johnson v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Deutsch v. SheinKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- ZF Meritor LLC v. Eaton CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Lepage's Incorporated v. 3m (Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- James E. Gottshall v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Collins v. Union County JailSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.