Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Block
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided June 2, 1987No. A1-83-47PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum and Order
VAN SICKLE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs’ First Amended Supplemental Class Action Complaint was filed January 21, 1986. The factual background of the supplemental complaint is provided in Coleman v. Block, 632 F.Supp. 1005 (D.N.D.1986). Defendants have brought a motion for an order granting a summary judgment of dismissal of the supplemental complaint, filed June 16, 1986. The motion has been exhaustively briefed, and was the subject of a hearing held March 23, 1987.
The supplemental complaint presents fourteen claims for relief, all of which are challenged by the summary…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,305 United States of America v. Dos Cabezas Corp., an Arizona Corporation State of Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Coleman v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Coleman v. LyngCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Williams v. ConnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- INTERN. CAUCUS OF LABOR COM. v. Dade County, Fla.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.