Legal Opinion

Orton v. Basic Magnesium, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided November 28, 1945No. 409PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FOLEY, District Judge.

That portion of defendant’s motion asking for the dismissal of the action is denied.

That part of the motion requesting a more definite statement of the matters stated in plaintiffs’ complaint is granted to the extent hereinafter indicated and the orders hereinafter made are suggested by Fleming v. Smoot Sand & Gravel Corporation, D. C., 41 F.Supp. 330 and Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co., D.C., 46 F.Supp. 969.

It is ordered that the named plaintiffs furnish defendant within 30 days from the date of mailing to their attorney, Harold O. Taber, Esq., Reno, Nevada, by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
  2. Fleming v. Smoot Sand & Gravel Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wright v. United States Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API