Legal Opinion
Winsted v. Berryhill
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 8, 2019No. 18-2228PublishedCited by 329 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Brennan, Circuit Judge.
Ronnie Winsted applied for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income claiming disability based on numerous conditions, including degenerative disc disease, osteoarthritis, and anxiety. An administrative law judge denied benefits, finding that Winsted could work with certain limitations. After the district court upheld this denial, Winsted appealed, arguing the ALJ did not consider his difficulties with concentration, persistence, and pace. We agree-the ALJ did not adequately explain how the limitations he placed on Winsted's residual functional…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Elder v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Craft v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- James Young v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Melissa Varga v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- O'Connor-Spinner v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by329 opinions
- Tara Crump v. Andrew M. SaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Gail Martin v. Andrew M. SaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Hortansia Lothridge v. Andrew SaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Margaret Grotts v. Kilolo KijakaziCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- Brenda L. v. SaulDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
324 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.