Legal Opinion
Muchisky v. Frederic Roofing Co., Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 4, 1992No. 60669PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Presiding Judge.
This appeal follows a judgment for homeowner, Thomas P. Muchisky, against contractor, Frederic Roofing Co., Inc. The suit involved a contract to re-roof the Mu-chisky home with one layer of U.S. Intec1 Brai/Flex, modified bitumen, single ply system. After contractor installed the roof and made two attempts at remedial work, homeowner filed a three count petition. Count I alleged breach of contract. Count II alleged breach of warranty. Count III alleged a violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2301. Contractor counterclaimed alleging breach of contract…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Foremost-McKesson, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miller v. HermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Atkinson v. Elk Corp. of TexasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Sadler v. Pella Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- Chrysler Financial Co., LLC v. FlynnMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Parkville Benefit Assessment Spec. Road Dist. v. Platte CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.