Legal Opinion
Schindler v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 19, 1993No. 90-3315VPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBINSON, Judge.
On October 1, 1990, petitioner filed a request for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, (the “Vaccine Act” or the “Act”) 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (1988), amended by several public laws (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 300aa-l to -34 (West Supp.1992)),1 on behalf of his son, Karl Michael Schindler. Chief Special Master Gary J. Golkiewicz concluded, on September 23, 1992, that petitioner was not entitled to compensation under the Act. Schindler v. Secretary of HHS, No. 90-3315V, 1992 WL 279250 (Cl. Ct.Spec.Mstr. September 23, 1992). This…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Melissa Hines, on Behalf of Her Minor Daughter, Amber Sevier v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schindler v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Schindler v. Secretary Of HhsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994