Legal Opinion
Schindler v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human Services
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 7, 1994No. 93-5145PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COHN, District Judge.
Petitioner, Charles Schindler (Schindler), as natural parent and co-conservator of Karl Michael Schindler, appeals from the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims1, affirming the Special Master’s decision dismissing Schindler’s petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vac*608cine Injury Act of 1986 (the Act), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34 (1988 & Supp. IV 1992). The Court of Federal Claims held that the Special Master correctly determined that proceedings in a Michigan probate court approving a settlement between Schindler and Karl’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lisa Munn, Personal Representative of the Estate of Chelsea Vukelich v. The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Ve Holding Corporation v. Johnson Gas Appliance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Slattery v. WoodinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- State ex rel. Sanderson v. MannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Twp. of Bordentown v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Schindler v. Secretary Of HhsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994