Legal Opinion
Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 11, 1935No. 6959PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal, seasonably allowed by us and by the District Court, raises questions in respect to the constitutionality of section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended by the Frazier-Lemke Act of June 28, 1931 (adding subsection (s), 11 USCA § 203). The facts are not in dispute, and are sufficiently found in the opinion of the District Judge. In re Radford, 8 F. Supp. 489.
The bankrupt is a farmer. In 1922 he borrowed $8,000 and in 1924 an additional $1,000 from the appellant bank, giving as security mortgages on his 170-acre farm in Christian county, Ky., the mortgages…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Curry v. Associates Financial Services (In Re Curry)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
- Centran Bank of Akron v. Ambrose (In Re Ambrose)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
- In Re HillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
- Tennessee Pub. Co. v. American Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- Bradford v. FaheyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.