Legal Opinion

Haug v. Primeau

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Houghton. (Haire, J., presiding.) Bill to remove cloud from title. Decree overruling demurrer affirmed, and defendant given 30 days in which to answer. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Bill to remove- qloud from title. Complainant married one Michael Haug, November 30, 1889. He died intestate July 19, 1890, leaving no children surviving him. June 10, 1891, Mathias Haug petitioned the probate court for administration upon the estate of Michael Haug. He averred in his petition that he was interested in the estate as a half-brother of the deceased; that the deceased died seised of real estate of the value of $400, but left no personal estate; that the heirs at law were Mary Haug, his wife, aged 30 years, and the petitioner, a half-brother, both residents of this State, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shipman v. ButterfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Berner's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. In Re Cloward's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Larson v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. In Re Matson's EstateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Chandler v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API