Legal Opinion

Ware v. United States Steel Corp.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1976PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENRY, Justice.

This is an appeal from a denial of Workmen’s Compensation benefits in a suit wherein the claim was predicated upon silicosis and recovery was sought under the occupational disease statutes, § 50-1101, et seq., T.C.A.

*109

Claimant was employed by United States Steel Corporation for approximately thirty years. Sometime around 1964 he developed hypertensive cardiovascular disease. In February 1969 he suffered a myocardial infarction, but recovered sufficiently well to resume his employment. In March 1971 he suffered a second myocardial infarction.

After this second heart attack…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Standard Surety & Casualty Co. of New York v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Wilson v. Van Buren CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  3. McKenzie v. Campbell and Dann Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Mathis v. ForrestTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Hartford Hosiery Mills v. JerniganTennessee Supreme Court · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Corcoran v. Foster Auto GMC, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Roberson v. Loretto Casket Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Jones v. CrenshawTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Jackson v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Jaske v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API