Ware v. United States Steel Corp.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENRY, Justice.
This is an appeal from a denial of Workmen’s Compensation benefits in a suit wherein the claim was predicated upon silicosis and recovery was sought under the occupational disease statutes, § 50-1101, et seq., T.C.A.
*109
Claimant was employed by United States Steel Corporation for approximately thirty years. Sometime around 1964 he developed hypertensive cardiovascular disease. In February 1969 he suffered a myocardial infarction, but recovered sufficiently well to resume his employment. In March 1971 he suffered a second myocardial infarction.
After this second heart attack…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Standard Surety & Casualty Co. of New York v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
- Wilson v. Van Buren CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
- McKenzie v. Campbell and Dann Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
- Mathis v. ForrestTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
- Hartford Hosiery Mills v. JerniganTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Corcoran v. Foster Auto GMC, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- Roberson v. Loretto Casket Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1986
- Jones v. CrenshawTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
- Jackson v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1987
- Jaske v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.