Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kizer v. Hanna

California Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1989No. S005834Published

1DissentKaufman, J.

I respectfully dissent. In my view, the Court of Appeal in Estate of Messner (1987) 190 Cal.App.3d 818 [235 Cal.Rptr. 495], correctly held that in enacting Welfare and Institutions Code section 14009.5 (section 14009.5), the Legislature did not intend to subject decedents’ estates to claims by the Department of Health Services (department) for reimbursement of amounts paid before June 28, 1981, the section’s effective date, for health care services rendered to the decedent.

“It is an established canon of interpretation that statutes are not to be given a retrospective operation unless it is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. United States v. JacobsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Burks v. Poppy Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API