Legal Opinion
Samoa Development, Inc. v. American Samoa Power Authority
High Court of American Samoa
Decided August 24, 2001No. CA No. 146-95Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff Samoa Development Inc. (“Samoa Development”) brings this suit for damages against defendants American Samoa Power Authority (“ASPA”) and Fred Pele (“Pele”) for wrongfully cancelling an award of procurement. ASPA and Pele contend their act was justified by the explicit terms governing the award, specifically those applicable to contractors’ bonds. The case proceeded to trial on November 28, 2000. Both counsel were present.
Facts
On June 8, 1995, the Office of Procurement of the American Samoa Government issued an Invitation for Bids for Project #AS-NH-001(29),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Hunt Ltd. v. Lifschultz Fast Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Record Club of America, Incorporated, Cross-Appellant v. United Artists Records, Incorporated, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Hospital for Women Ex Rel. Green v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
- Schull Construction Co. v. Board of Regents of EducationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.