Marriage of Lemcke v. Lemcke
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge
Dayna Lemcke appeals from a dissolution judgment providing that Michael Lemcke have sole physical custody of Dylan, the Lemckes’ four-year-old son. Day-na Lemcke claims that, as a matter of law, the district court abused its discretion in allowing Michael Lemcke to have sole physical custody notwithstanding its finding that he had initially attempted to alienate Dylan from her and her extended family. Because in determining that Michael Lemcke would have sole physical custody the district court properly weighed all the relevant statutory factors, including Michael…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nehra v. UhlarNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Nickerson v. NickersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Begins v. BeginsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Amarreh v. AmarrehCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018