Legal Opinion
In re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated March 2, 2015
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 6, 2015No. 15-1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESENT: ROBERT D. SACK, DENNY CHIN, CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY, Circuit Judges.
SUMMARY ORDER
Intervenor-appellant is an investment company (the “Company”) whose president and owner (the “Owner”) is the subject of an ongoing grand jury investigation into tax fraud. On June 5, 2015, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an order compelling the Company’s attorneys to produce certain attorney-client communications between the attorneys and the Owner. The district court held that the crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege applied to their…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Joseph Fama v. Commissioner of Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. ZukermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- United States v. TuckerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- United States v. ZukermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018