Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Castro

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1953No. 5737PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment that plaintiffs take nothing, entered at the close of plaintiffs’ case, and from an order denying their motion for new trial. This suit for damages was tried to the court sitting without a jury. The parties are before us in the same order as they were in the lower court, hence we shall herein refer to appellants and appellee as plaintiffs and defendant, respectively.

The complaint alleges that due to the reckless and negligent manner in which the ■defendant drove his automobile into, among, and upon a herd of cattle that six head of dairy cattle…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Butane Corporation v. KirbyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Chadwick v. LarsenArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Holmes v. LindseyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carrow Co. v. LusbyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. O'CONNOR v. BlackIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Anguiano v. Transcontinental Bus System, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Jensen v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  5. Jarvis v. KossSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API