Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 31, 1963No. C.D.2417PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LawiíeNCE, Judge:

According to the report of the collector of customs in transmitting plaintiff’s protest to this court, it appears that certain imported merchandise was classified in liquidation as “band or hoop, iron or steel, cut to lengths, or partly or wholly manufactured into hoops or ties, for baling cotton or any other commodity,” which is provided for in paragraph 814 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 I7.S.C. § 1001, par. 314), as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of 0.1…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Fensterer & Voss Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  3. John H. Graham & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Daido Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API